Thursday, February 8, 2007

Klare's "New" Book

In Klare's new book, "Blood for Oil", he takes a post 9/11 stance on his original thoughts brought about in his book, "Resource Wars". Oddly enough, the ideas that "Blood for Oil" present are very much the same as its pre-9/11 counterpart. In "Resource Wars", Klare discusses numerous examples of resources, wars, conflicts, and reasons why resources (such as oil) will play key roles in our future. Now, after 9/11, he responds with what I feel is an "I told you so" attitude, or maybe that is just how I perceive it. He is now able to go in depth into the history and recent events in accordance with the attacks on 9/11 and our retaliation against in relationship to our need for oil. I found the discussion of the history the U.S. has with oil dependence. He brought up a key factor that I believe we discussed in class dealing with the Saudi royal family. It's interesting to see the perspective of how the dependence on oil came about, starting with our decline in oil resources and President Franklin D. Roosevelt's meeting and agreement with the Saudi royal family, which has been upheld through every Presidency since. Which brings us to this Presidency, in which Dick Cheney has historic ties to Saudi Arabia. In general, Klare's main focus in this book and the things that struck him the most werer the degree of dependence of our society on cheap, abundant oil, as well as how priveledged we were with a very large oil supply, and until that oil supply started to deplete, we weren't concerned. What really strikes me about this, is that it becomes very apparent that we are unable to function properly when our economy is threatened. Instead of thinking in terms of alternatives, we think in terms of attacking, and until we can get past this idea, and I feel this is what Klare is saying, war's and conflicts will be prevelant for the rest of our lives...

1 comment:

funnybuddhist said...

I think you overlooked the most important thing: Hypocrisy is in the personal level, not govermental. Have you ever heard Mother Teresa criticized the Government for not being magnanimous enough to other countries? She does everything for the poor by "herself" and thus, forcing others to open up. The US government is for the US interest, they will do anything to bring more interest to the people "inside" the country. You can debate if Bush is helping the Rich more; but by getting more oil, "you" or the lowest level citizen inside America benefit too. Don't forget that. On the other hand, The people inside Saudi Arabia benefit from US greed for their oil too. By "buying", not "robbing" oil from Saudi, the US put a lot of investments and technologies in Saudi. No arguing that the Saudi royal family get the most of it; but in turn, they have to use the dollars to support their people in avoiding any uproar or revolution. Thus, the Saudi citizens get a part of the pie in the equation. The average Saudi citizen income level is among the highest or the highest in the region. Well, they hate the royal dictatorship, so what? Now, take a look at Iraq, Saddam did not deal with the US. Were Iraqis citizens better off than Saudis? Saddam got the money from selling oil to other countries in exchange for..."weapons", ladies and gentlemen. The truth is that as long as the Middle East does not have democracy, to have the US greed is better than have not. Lastly, you may ask "what if" the US were not there. Would you think the Russians or the Chinese leave that region untouched? Would you think Russia and China will offer better bargain than the US? Would they care more for the people there than the US? And what if Russia or China took control of the oil there and overtook US in economy as well as technology? You don't know them because you don't know your reality, ladies and gentlemen